Image from Google Jackets

Waitt and another v Morris and another

Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1994) 39 EG 140-142(3)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: LT 3 August 1994. W were leaseholders of a flat and applied for a 90-year lease extension at a peppercorn rent. Applying for a determination of the price payable, W`s valuer suggested a marriage value of £2000, being the difference between the current open market value and value of the extended lease, and that M should take 50% share. W also sought a covenant requiring M to give notice of any forfeiture proceedings. As a prospective purchaser had offered a higher sum for the lease than the extended value, the marriage value and landlord`s share were raised by the LT and unpaid arrears of rent awarded. The requested covenant was deemed unnecessary.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS51582 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 34053-1001

LT 3 August 1994. W were leaseholders of a flat and applied for a 90-year lease extension at a peppercorn rent. Applying for a determination of the price payable, W`s valuer suggested a marriage value of £2000, being the difference between the current open market value and value of the extended lease, and that M should take 50% share. W also sought a covenant requiring M to give notice of any forfeiture proceedings. As a prospective purchaser had offered a higher sum for the lease than the extended value, the marriage value and landlord`s share were raised by the LT and unpaid arrears of rent awarded. The requested covenant was deemed unnecessary.