Compulsory purchase
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1996 EGCS 102 (15/6/96)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: "Shaikh v Bolton MBC" CA 24 May 1996. A claim for interest on owner occupier supplement delayed due to dispute over the claimant`s right to the supplement was allowed as compensation under Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 s11(1).| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3224-14 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 34115-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3222-43 Poster site on rating list | WB3223-14 Entitlement to interest on supplement | WB3223-36 Variation of land sale contract invalid | WB3224-14 Compulsory purchase | WB3224-32 Surety | WB3224-37 Compulsory purchase | WB3224-40 Surveyors |
"Shaikh v Bolton MBC" CA 24 May 1996. A claim for interest on owner occupier supplement delayed due to dispute over the claimant`s right to the supplement was allowed as compensation under Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 s11(1).