Crown House Engineering Ltd v AMEC Projects
Language: English Series: Construction Industry Law Letter ; (1989) CILL 536-537(2)Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: CA 30 November 1989. Crown (C) carried out M & E works for AMEC (A); interim certificates were issued, but there was doubt as to whether a contract was ever concluded between C and A. C began proceedings against A for payment, pleaded initially in contract but later amended for a reasonable sum as quantum meruit . C started a second action against A for retention monies . In the main action C applied for an 0.29 interim payment; in the retention action C sought 0.14 summary judgement. They were successful in both applications. A appealed against both orders. Both of A`s appeals allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS42126 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 34849-1001 |
CA 30 November 1989. Crown (C) carried out M & E works for AMEC (A); interim certificates were issued, but there was doubt as to whether a contract was ever concluded between C and A. C began proceedings against A for payment, pleaded initially in contract but later amended for a reasonable sum as quantum meruit . C started a second action against A for retention monies . In the main action C applied for an 0.29 interim payment; in the retention action C sought 0.14 summary judgement. They were successful in both applications. A appealed against both orders. Both of A`s appeals allowed.