JE Clark & Co v Rogers (VO)
Language: English Series: Rating Appeals ; (1994) 7/8 RA 169-209(21)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: LT 10 June 1994. Following alteration of premises and subletting to new occupiers between 1988 and 1992, rateable values were revised and the rating list amended. The ratepayer appealed against the valuation, stressing the poor standard of the buildings and arguing that the open market value of the whole complex in 1988 was the most reliable guide to assessment. Rental values were not used in this case and valuation was based on the `tone of the list`. "Held" that the 1988 open market value be used as evidence and the assessment be reduced.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS51632 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 36212-1001 |
LT 10 June 1994. Following alteration of premises and subletting to new occupiers between 1988 and 1992, rateable values were revised and the rating list amended. The ratepayer appealed against the valuation, stressing the poor standard of the buildings and arguing that the open market value of the whole complex in 1988 was the most reliable guide to assessment. Rental values were not used in this case and valuation was based on the `tone of the list`. "Held" that the 1988 open market value be used as evidence and the assessment be reduced.