Sun Alliance and London Assurance Co Ltd v British Railways Board
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Law Reports ; (1989) 2 EGLR 237-239(2)Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: ChD 28 October 1986. SA were underlessors and the defendants (BR) underlessees of Templegate House, Bristol. SA wished BR to contribute towards the cost and maintenance of an automated window cleaning lift to replace an older structure operated by a maintenance contractor. BR claimed that the clauses that bound them to pay for the maintenance of equipment and cleaning did not apply to the new lift since it was added after the tenancy agreement had been signed. The judge considered that the clause concerning services and equipment for the benefit of the building and its proper maintenance included new equipment. SA were entitled to their money claim against BR.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS42377 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 36442-1001 |
ChD 28 October 1986. SA were underlessors and the defendants (BR) underlessees of Templegate House, Bristol. SA wished BR to contribute towards the cost and maintenance of an automated window cleaning lift to replace an older structure operated by a maintenance contractor. BR claimed that the clauses that bound them to pay for the maintenance of equipment and cleaning did not apply to the new lift since it was added after the tenancy agreement had been signed. The judge considered that the clause concerning services and equipment for the benefit of the building and its proper maintenance included new equipment. SA were entitled to their money claim against BR.