Estate agent cleared over sign
Language: English Series: Independent ; 2/12/88 p15 Financial Times 2/12/88 p12Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: In Porter v Honey HL 1 December 1988, the House of Lords ruled that an estate agent who was the first to put a for sale sign outside a property could not be guilty of an offence under planning laws if other agents subsequently placed for sale signs on the same property.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2448-36 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 37776-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2448-33 Tourism growth | WB2448-34 Planning control breach | WB2448-35 Estate agency arson | WB2448-36 Estate agent cleared over sign | WB2448-37 Property development funding | WB2448-38 Property predators | WB2448-39 Property unit trust |
In Porter v Honey HL 1 December 1988, the House of Lords ruled that an estate agent who was the first to put a for sale sign outside a property could not be guilty of an offence under planning laws if other agents subsequently placed for sale signs on the same property.