Image from Google Jackets

BSC Pension Fund Trustees Ltd v Downing and others

Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1990) 19 EG 87-90(3)Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: ChD 18 July 1989. The landlords (B) sought declarations to the effect that the agricultural tenancy of the late George March senior which had vested in the three defendants as administrators with the will annexed, had been duly determined. The points at issue was whether a notice to quit served by B relying on Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 Sched 3 Case G was valid and effective; whether the notice was given not later than the end of the period of three months beginning with the date of any relevant notice; the meaning of "relevant notice" and the position as to notice to quit if no relevant notice given. The deceased tenant had outlived his two sons, the tenancy having been originally been vested in three of them. The tenancy was vested in the President of the Family Division until eventually the defendants obtained a grant of administration with the will annexed. The notice to quit was served in February 1987 on the President. No "relevant notice" within the meaning of Case G and p
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS42733 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 38623-1001

ChD 18 July 1989. The landlords (B) sought declarations to the effect that the agricultural tenancy of the late George March senior which had vested in the three defendants as administrators with the will annexed, had been duly determined. The points at issue was whether a notice to quit served by B relying on Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 Sched 3 Case G was valid and effective; whether the notice was given not later than the end of the period of three months beginning with the date of any relevant notice; the meaning of "relevant notice" and the position as to notice to quit if no relevant notice given. The deceased tenant had outlived his two sons, the tenancy having been originally been vested in three of them. The tenancy was vested in the President of the Family Division until eventually the defendants obtained a grant of administration with the will annexed. The notice to quit was served in February 1987 on the President. No "relevant notice" within the meaning of Case G and p