Housing decisions
Language: English Series: Times ; 13 October 1992, 36(1)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: In "R v Harrow LBC ex p. Hobbs and another" QBD 24 August 1992, it was held that while a housing officer when reaching a decision as to whether a person or family had become intentionally homeless might sometimes find it necessary or expedient to hear from the applicant orally, the legislative scheme of the Housing Acts did not require that of him.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2840-27 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 38976-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In "R v Harrow LBC ex p. Hobbs and another" QBD 24 August 1992, it was held that while a housing officer when reaching a decision as to whether a person or family had become intentionally homeless might sometimes find it necessary or expedient to hear from the applicant orally, the legislative scheme of the Housing Acts did not require that of him.