Ruling on ending of tenancy is terminally problematic
Language: English Series: Property Week ; 52(5-6) 3-10 August 1995, 25(1)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: Considers the implications of the "Esselte AB v Pearl Assurance" decision giving statutory protection to business tenants under Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 even though the occupancy criteria is not met. Decision expected to be challenged in CA.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS53445 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 4244-1001 |
Considers the implications of the "Esselte AB v Pearl Assurance" decision giving statutory protection to business tenants under Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 even though the occupancy criteria is not met. Decision expected to be challenged in CA.