Forfeiture of deposit
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1991 EGCS 108 (9/11/91)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: "Tanap Investments (UK) Ltd v Tozer and others" ChD 28 October 1991. Purchasers of land failed in a claim for the return of the deposit with interest when the sale fell through since the vendors were not found to be in breach of contract by not declaring a recent conveyance, which did not affect title to the land.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2744-30 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 40016-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2744-19 Construction of lease | WB2744-20 Possession order | WB2744-26 Material change of use | WB2744-30 Forfeiture of deposit | WB2745-12 Compulsorily purchased land | WB2745-19 Intentionally homeless | WB2745-23 Creation of tenancy |
"Tanap Investments (UK) Ltd v Tozer and others" ChD 28 October 1991. Purchasers of land failed in a claim for the return of the deposit with interest when the sale fell through since the vendors were not found to be in breach of contract by not declaring a recent conveyance, which did not affect title to the land.