Building not redundant
Language: English Series: Times ; Times 17 November 1994, 32(1)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: In "Bruce v SoS Environment", CA 25 October 1994, it was held that service of an enforcement notice on a building to stop its use in breach of planning control did not render the bulding redundant, the owner of the building could not rely on government policy on the re-use of redundant buildings in the Green Belt.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3043-54 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 4314-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3043-51 Dinosaur offices | WB3043-52 Planning for a green London | WB3043-53 Pool broke planning law | WB3043-54 Building not redundant | WB3043-56 Allsop & Co in claim | WB3043-57 First National issues writs | WB3043-58 Incorporation looms |
In "Bruce v SoS Environment", CA 25 October 1994, it was held that service of an enforcement notice on a building to stop its use in breach of planning control did not render the bulding redundant, the owner of the building could not rely on government policy on the re-use of redundant buildings in the Green Belt.