Hallows v Welsh Office
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1995) 21 EG 126-133(8)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: LT 23 January 1995. H claimed for depreciation in the value of his property attributable to a bypass, claiming that the Land Compensation Act 1973 required proof only of depreciation in value of the subject property and not proof of open market value before and after the opening of the bypass; thus national evidence was admissible along with local evidence. W denied there had been any depreciation and sought to have the hearing dismissed for lack of evidence. Held, the subject property benefited from the bypass and no compensation was payable.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS52866 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 554-1001 |
LT 23 January 1995. H claimed for depreciation in the value of his property attributable to a bypass, claiming that the Land Compensation Act 1973 required proof only of depreciation in value of the subject property and not proof of open market value before and after the opening of the bypass; thus national evidence was admissible along with local evidence. W denied there had been any depreciation and sought to have the hearing dismissed for lack of evidence. Held, the subject property benefited from the bypass and no compensation was payable.