Cayzer v Hamilton (No.1)

Language: English Series: Scots Law Times ; 1996 SLT (Land CT) 18-21 (4)Publication details: 1996Subject(s):

Summary: Scottish Land Court. Lord Philip, D D McDiarmid, J Kinloch. 1 February 1994. Landlord and tenant - agricultural holding - notice to remedy - validity - whether extrinsic evidence admissible to explain notice - whether notice requireed to specify provision of lease allegedly breached - Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 1991

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Law report	London Journal article	E2780 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	40913-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	E2767 Barn Properties Ltd v Secretary of State for Scotland	E2769 Marfield Properties Ltd v Secretary of State for thee Environment	E2779 Kennedy v Hamilton District Council	E2780 Cayzer v Hamilton (No.1)	E2781 Cayzer v Hamilton (No.2)	E2782 Martin v MacSween	E2784 McCarthy v City of Glasgow District Council	Next

Scottish Land Court. Lord Philip, D D McDiarmid, J Kinloch. 1 February 1994. Landlord and tenant - agricultural holding - notice to remedy - validity - whether extrinsic evidence admissible to explain notice - whether notice requireed to specify provision of lease allegedly breached - Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 1991

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)