Museprime Properties Ltd v Adhill Properties Ltd
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1990) 36 EG 114-124(6)Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: ChD 27 February 1990. Action by M seeking recission of a contract signed at auction , return of a deposit of £49,000 and damages to cover conveyancing expenses thrown away, on the ground that they were induced to enter into the contract by a material misrepresentation for which A, vendors of three properties in North London were responsible. Rents from the three properties had been wrongly misrepresented at the auction as open to negotiation . ChD held that M had established their claim to the recission of the contract on the ground of material misrepresentation for which A were responsible. M were entitled to return of their deposit and damages in respect of lost conveyancing expenses with interest.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS43413 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 41600-1001 |
ChD 27 February 1990. Action by M seeking recission of a contract signed at auction , return of a deposit of £49,000 and damages to cover conveyancing expenses thrown away, on the ground that they were induced to enter into the contract by a material misrepresentation for which A, vendors of three properties in North London were responsible. Rents from the three properties had been wrongly misrepresented at the auction as open to negotiation . ChD held that M had established their claim to the recission of the contract on the ground of material misrepresentation for which A were responsible. M were entitled to return of their deposit and damages in respect of lost conveyancing expenses with interest.