Recovering bank charges
Language: English Series: Times ; 4 May 1994, 39(1)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: In "Ogilvie Builders Ltd v Glasgow CDC", Court of Session 4 March 1994, it was held that where a JCT building contract entitled a party to reparation for `direct loss and/or expense`, he was entitled to recover bank charges and loss of interest consequent upon his need to cover other such items of loss and expense, for a loss arising naturally according to the usual course of things within the meaning of the rule in "Hadley v Baxendale" was the same as `direct loss`.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3017-05 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 41722-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3016-53 Caravan site | WB3016-54 Caravans | WB3016-55 Inspection fee | WB3017-05 Recovering bank charges | WB3017-26 Determining existence of right of way | WB3017-35 Council enquiries on homelessness | WB3017-40 Forfeiture |
In "Ogilvie Builders Ltd v Glasgow CDC", Court of Session 4 March 1994, it was held that where a JCT building contract entitled a party to reparation for `direct loss and/or expense`, he was entitled to recover bank charges and loss of interest consequent upon his need to cover other such items of loss and expense, for a loss arising naturally according to the usual course of things within the meaning of the rule in "Hadley v Baxendale" was the same as `direct loss`.