How to lose £1 million
Language: English Series: Architects` Journal ; 192(17) 24 October 1990, 75-76(2)Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: Discusses Adams Holden and Pearson v Trent Regional Health Authority (1989) which held that where a client requests services from an architect which fall outside the scope of the contract , the architect can recover reasonable remuneration only if he can show that the client undertook to pay and that a term will not be implied into a contract unless there is an obvious gap to fill and this term must be capable of precise expression.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS43447 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 41761-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses Adams Holden and Pearson v Trent Regional Health Authority (1989) which held that where a client requests services from an architect which fall outside the scope of the contract , the architect can recover reasonable remuneration only if he can show that the client undertook to pay and that a term will not be implied into a contract unless there is an obvious gap to fill and this term must be capable of precise expression.