Appeal court warns DoE of the risk of random sampling

By:

Lloyd, H

Language: English Series: Building ; 255(7666) 28 September 1990, 41(1)Publication details: 1990Subject(s):

Summary: Considers the case of NHBC Building Control Services v Sandwell BC which discussed validity of random sampling by building inspectors when issuing final certificates .

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	ABS43458 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	41817-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	ABS43455 Subcontractors precarious position	ABS43456 Whose retention is it anyway?	ABS43457 Will industry sign the pledge on ADR?	ABS43458 Appeal court warns DoE of the risk of random sampling	ABS43459 Value engineering: opportunity or threat	ABS43460 Have critics of collateral warranties got a point?	ABS43461 When is a loss economic?	Next

Considers the case of NHBC Building Control Services v Sandwell BC which discussed validity of random sampling by building inspectors when issuing final certificates .

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)