Time runs from arbitrator`s appointment
Language: English Series: Times ; 30 December 1993, 34(1)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: "Hannaford v Smallacombe" CA 16 December 1993, held that the 35-day time limit in which parties to an arbitration under the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 must file statements of case ran from the time when the arbitrator received notice of appointment not when the parties received the arbitrator`s acknowledgement of appointment. CA allowed appeal by landlord.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3001-35 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 42084-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
"Hannaford v Smallacombe" CA 16 December 1993, held that the 35-day time limit in which parties to an arbitration under the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 must file statements of case ran from the time when the arbitrator received notice of appointment not when the parties received the arbitrator`s acknowledgement of appointment. CA allowed appeal by landlord.