Rous v Mitchell
Language: English Series: New Law Journal ; (1990) NLJ 1386-1387(2)Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: CA 31 July 1990. The plaintiff, X. was freehold owner of an estate which included two farms let to Y in 1953. The tenancy of the farms, which included a number of cottages , was subject to a covenant preventing assignment or underletting other than to workmen on the farms. In July 1980 X served notice to quit on Y under Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 s26 alleging breach of covenant . Under Sched 3 Case E a landlord of an agricultural holding was entitled to possession if at the date of the giving of notice the landlords` interest in the holding had been materially prejudiced by a breach of covenant by the tenant which was not capable of being remedied. Y instead of claiming arbitration under Agricultural Holdings (Arbitration on Notice) Order 1987 for the resolution of a Case E despute, served a counternotice requiring the notice to be referred to an agricultural lands tribunal . X served a writ claiming a declaration that in the absence of a counternotice requiring arbitration the t| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS43530 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 42227-1001 |
CA 31 July 1990. The plaintiff, X. was freehold owner of an estate which included two farms let to Y in 1953. The tenancy of the farms, which included a number of cottages , was subject to a covenant preventing assignment or underletting other than to workmen on the farms. In July 1980 X served notice to quit on Y under Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 s26 alleging breach of covenant . Under Sched 3 Case E a landlord of an agricultural holding was entitled to possession if at the date of the giving of notice the landlords` interest in the holding had been materially prejudiced by a breach of covenant by the tenant which was not capable of being remedied. Y instead of claiming arbitration under Agricultural Holdings (Arbitration on Notice) Order 1987 for the resolution of a Case E despute, served a counternotice requiring the notice to be referred to an agricultural lands tribunal . X served a writ claiming a declaration that in the absence of a counternotice requiring arbitration the t