Teesside Indoor Bowls Ltd v Stockton-on-Tees BC
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1990) 46 EG 116-120(3)Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: CA 2 April 1990. Appeal by tenant (T) against a CC decision accepting the landlord`s (S) reason for refusing to grant a new tenancy under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s30(1)(g) for premises used for a bowling club with associated facilities such as a bar. At issue was whether S had established that premises were intended to be occupied for the purpose of a business to be carried on by them and whether this comes within the meaning of s30(1)(g). A management company was to run the facility for S under the term "agency". CA held that premises were to be used for a business carried out by S through the company as S`s agent. Appeal dismissed with costs.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS43699 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 43073-1001 |
CA 2 April 1990. Appeal by tenant (T) against a CC decision accepting the landlord`s (S) reason for refusing to grant a new tenancy under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s30(1)(g) for premises used for a bowling club with associated facilities such as a bar. At issue was whether S had established that premises were intended to be occupied for the purpose of a business to be carried on by them and whether this comes within the meaning of s30(1)(g). A management company was to run the facility for S under the term "agency". CA held that premises were to be used for a business carried out by S through the company as S`s agent. Appeal dismissed with costs.