Disturbance compensation : flexibility and the principle of equivalence
Language: English Series: JPL ; September 1986, 656-665(10)Publication details: 1986Description: See Abstracts 27871,31322Subject(s): Summary: Discusses whether a landlord whose land is acquired can claim for losses resulting from displacement, such as removal and professional fees . The author examines in detail entitlement to disturbance compensation and the principle of equivalence, following the decisions in Smith v Strathclyde Regional Council and Park Automobile Co Ltd v Strathclyde Regional Council .| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS36837 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 578-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses whether a landlord whose land is acquired can claim for losses resulting from displacement, such as removal and professional fees . The author examines in detail entitlement to disturbance compensation and the principle of equivalence, following the decisions in Smith v Strathclyde Regional Council and Park Automobile Co Ltd v Strathclyde Regional Council .