Linden Gardens v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd ; McLaughlin & Harvey plc ; and Ashwell Construction Co Ltd
Language: English Series: Construction Industry Law Letter ; [1990] CILL 612-613(2)Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: CA 13 February 1992. The court had to decide on the construction and effect of the prohibition on assignment. It was held that prohibition on assignment did prevent the benefit of the rights to call for the performance of the contracts from being assignable. However, assignment of benefits and claims for damages for the removal of asbestos under the contracts were allowed, where the cause of action had accrued at the date of the assignment.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS43838 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 43710-1001 |
CA 13 February 1992. The court had to decide on the construction and effect of the prohibition on assignment. It was held that prohibition on assignment did prevent the benefit of the rights to call for the performance of the contracts from being assignable. However, assignment of benefits and claims for damages for the removal of asbestos under the contracts were allowed, where the cause of action had accrued at the date of the assignment.