Planning appeal evidence
Language: English Series: Times ; 24 June 1992, LT10(1)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: "Clarke v SoS Environment" CA 12 June 1992 overturned the HC ruling on the grounds that under Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s289, HC should not have received evidence unless it could be argued that the inspector at the planning enquiry had not property summarised the evidence or had disregarded evidence.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2825-33 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 43912-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2825-25 Landlord snookered by tenant in repair | WB2825-26 Succeeding deceased tenant | WB2825-32 Natural justice | WB2825-33 Planning appeal evidence | WB2825-35 Misrepresentation | WB2826-31 Right of support | WB2826-32 Sunday trading ban |
"Clarke v SoS Environment" CA 12 June 1992 overturned the HC ruling on the grounds that under Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s289, HC should not have received evidence unless it could be argued that the inspector at the planning enquiry had not property summarised the evidence or had disregarded evidence.