Professional services: fees
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1992 EGCS 19(2) (22 February 1992)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: In "Lingard & Partners v Snowdon Mountain Railway and another" QBD 17 January 1992, a claim by architects for payment of fees for work carried out on a feasibility study for a tourist project on behalf of defendants was dismissed. A written agreement had been made in March 1985 for out-of-pocket expenses for outlining proposals. CA dismissed appellant`s claim that the developers were obliged to apply for planning permision even though planning permission was unlikely.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2809-40 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 44201-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In "Lingard & Partners v Snowdon Mountain Railway and another" QBD 17 January 1992, a claim by architects for payment of fees for work carried out on a feasibility study for a tourist project on behalf of defendants was dismissed. A written agreement had been made in March 1985 for out-of-pocket expenses for outlining proposals. CA dismissed appellant`s claim that the developers were obliged to apply for planning permision even though planning permission was unlikely.