Liability on unoccupied property
Language: English Series: Times ; 10/3/87 p9Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: In Trendworthy Two Ltd v Islington London Borough Council , CA 5 March 1987, it was held that the owner of a new building would not become liable to pay unoccupied property rates for the period it remained unoccupied, until the hereditament and its rateable value had been entered on the valuation list; unlike occupied premises, liability did not arise upon the VO proposing a rateable value to enter on the list.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2312-40 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 44309-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2312-32 New supremo at the Pru | WB2312-33 German market strong | WB2312-36 Possession despite counterclaim | WB2312-40 Liability on unoccupied property | WB2312-41 Shoppers dream | WB2312-44 A new roof over your head | WB2312-45 Basingstoke |
In Trendworthy Two Ltd v Islington London Borough Council , CA 5 March 1987, it was held that the owner of a new building would not become liable to pay unoccupied property rates for the period it remained unoccupied, until the hereditament and its rateable value had been entered on the valuation list; unlike occupied premises, liability did not arise upon the VO proposing a rateable value to enter on the list.