Recovery of costs
Language: English Series: EGCS ; (1991) 75 (20/7/91)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: Anderson v Benson CA 11 July 1991. An architect should have foreseen that damages would be claimed by a neighbour , whose window was obscured by an extension designed by the architect. The client`s appeal for the award of damages to cover the cost of paying the neighbour compensation was successful.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2729-01 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 44891-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2728-31 EC threat to tunnel rail link | WB2728-32 Rail freight | WB2728-33 City Challenge | WB2729-01 Recovery of costs | WB2729-02 Cancer warnings for glass fibre | WB2729-03 Construction products directive | WB2729-04 City office lettings |
Anderson v Benson CA 11 July 1991. An architect should have foreseen that damages would be claimed by a neighbour , whose window was obscured by an extension designed by the architect. The client`s appeal for the award of damages to cover the cost of paying the neighbour compensation was successful.