Noise abatement notices
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; [1996] EGCS 34(1) (2/3/96)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: "R v Mid Sussex Justices ex parte Mid Sussex DC" QBD 19 February 1996. Considers whether noise abatement notices had to specify works required. Held, notices could not be found defective ab initio.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3210-29 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 45193-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3209-49 Green belt for development | WB3209-51 Good marketable title | WB3210-07 Misleading statements | WB3210-29 Noise abatement notices | WB3210-30 Over-valuation statute barred | WB3210-35 Tenants in occupation | WB3211-04 Architectural contract |
"R v Mid Sussex Justices ex parte Mid Sussex DC" QBD 19 February 1996. Considers whether noise abatement notices had to specify works required. Held, notices could not be found defective ab initio.