Enhancing the rent
Language: English Series: Times ; 5 December 1995, 42(1)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: In "Ocean Accident and Guarantee Corporation v Next plc"; "Commercial Union Assurance Company plc v Next plc" ChD 23 November 1995, on appeal pursuant to the Arbitration Act 1979 s1(2) it was held that trade fixtures affixed to commercial premises by a tenant would not normally enhance the rent on a rent review.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3146-03 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 45637-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3145-61 Property lease-back test case | WB3146-01 Arbitration | WB3146-02 Arbitration | WB3146-03 Enhancing the rent | WB3146-29 Planning appeal conforms with Treaty | WB3146-35 Advertisement control | WB3146-36 Condition |
In "Ocean Accident and Guarantee Corporation v Next plc"; "Commercial Union Assurance Company plc v Next plc" ChD 23 November 1995, on appeal pursuant to the Arbitration Act 1979 s1(2) it was held that trade fixtures affixed to commercial premises by a tenant would not normally enhance the rent on a rent review.