Retention fund inescapable duty, says Court of Appeal

By:

Language: English Series: Building ; 256(7692) 12 April 1991, 28 (1)Publication details: 1991Subject(s):

Summary: Discussion of Wates Construction (London) v Franthom Property , which concerned retention money and placing it in a separate account.

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	ABS44362 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	46767-1001

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	ABS44359 Letter of intent holds back payment for contractor	ABS44360 Reading rules on the management contracts minefield	ABS44361 Reaping the benefits	ABS44362 Retention fund inescapable duty, says Court of Appeal	ABS44363 Target practice	ABS44364 The extension of time debate goes on	ABS44365 The Government General Conditions of Contract for Building and Civil Engineering - Edition 3	Next

Discussion of Wates Construction (London) v Franthom Property , which concerned retention money and placing it in a separate account.

Back to results