The extension of time debate goes on

By:

Powell-Smith, V

Language: English Series: Contract Journal ; 358(5817) 18 April 1991, 7 (1)Publication details: 1991Subject(s):

Summary: Responds to the view that contractors are entitled to have delay s absorbed by reasonable extensions of time, for variations of orders for example. Refers to Fernbrook Trading Co Ltd v Taggert .

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	ABS44364 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	46774-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	ABS44361 Reaping the benefits	ABS44362 Retention fund inescapable duty, says Court of Appeal	ABS44363 Target practice	ABS44364 The extension of time debate goes on	ABS44365 The Government General Conditions of Contract for Building and Civil Engineering - Edition 3	ABS44366 Alternative warranty scheme`s rough ride to acceptance	ABS44367 Movements in masonry buildings	Next

Responds to the view that contractors are entitled to have delay s absorbed by reasonable extensions of time, for variations of orders for example. Refers to Fernbrook Trading Co Ltd v Taggert .

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)