Green (VO) v Barnet LBC
Language: English Series: Rating Appeals ; (1994) 9 RA 235-257(12)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: LT 21 July 1994. A stadium and a swimming pool, run by B was regarded as exempt from rating as a public park under General Rate Act 1967 s44, with the exception of the pavilions occupied by sports clubs. G decided that the swimming pool and the stadium each constituted a separate hereditament and should be entered as such in the valuation list. In March 1989 G made a proposal for the separate assessment of the pool claiming that the pool and the stadium each had a separate curtilage capable of clear definition, demonstrated by reference to a plan. B contended that they fell within a combined curtilage and constituted a single hereditament. Held that the swimming pool was separate.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS51852 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 46847-1001 |
LT 21 July 1994. A stadium and a swimming pool, run by B was regarded as exempt from rating as a public park under General Rate Act 1967 s44, with the exception of the pavilions occupied by sports clubs. G decided that the swimming pool and the stadium each constituted a separate hereditament and should be entered as such in the valuation list. In March 1989 G made a proposal for the separate assessment of the pool claiming that the pool and the stadium each had a separate curtilage capable of clear definition, demonstrated by reference to a plan. B contended that they fell within a combined curtilage and constituted a single hereditament. Held that the swimming pool was separate.