Joint tenancy
Language: English Series: Times ; 29/5/89 p25Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: It was held in Mikeover Ltd v Brady CA 26 May 1989, that two parties to a renting agreement for a flat did not create a joint tenancy because the monetary obligations of the two parties were not joint obligations and there was no unity of interest.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2521-18 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 47339-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2521-15 Opposition to new lease | WB2521-16 Option to renew lease | WB2521-17 Statutory tenancy | WB2521-18 Joint tenancy | WB2521-19 Blueprint attack | WB2521-20 Green space warning | WB2521-21 Midlands superpit |
It was held in Mikeover Ltd v Brady CA 26 May 1989, that two parties to a renting agreement for a flat did not create a joint tenancy because the monetary obligations of the two parties were not joint obligations and there was no unity of interest.