Tootal Clothing Ltd v Guinea Properties Management Ltd
Language: English Series: Rent Review & Lease Renewal ; 13(1) Autumn 1992, 76-80(5)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: CA 4 June 1992. It was agreed between claimant (T) and defendant (G) that T would carry out shop-fitting works and, on satisfactory completion G would pay T £30,000 towards the cost of the works. G refused to pay claiming that s2 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 rendered the agreement void. The judge accepted this contention and T appealed. It was "held" that section 2 was concerned with executory contracts and did not apply to the supplementary agreement between T & G as this was an agreement separate to, and distinct from, the lease itself.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | Z2506 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 47648-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 4 June 1992. It was agreed between claimant (T) and defendant (G) that T would carry out shop-fitting works and, on satisfactory completion G would pay T £30,000 towards the cost of the works. G refused to pay claiming that s2 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 rendered the agreement void. The judge accepted this contention and T appealed. It was "held" that section 2 was concerned with executory contracts and did not apply to the supplementary agreement between T & G as this was an agreement separate to, and distinct from, the lease itself.