Redevelopment and landlords own occupation
Language: English Series: Rent Review & Lease Renewal ; 10(4) 1990, 353-362Publication details: 1990Subject(s):- BARTH V PRITCHARD
- BLACKBURN V HUSSAIN
- BUSINESS TENANCIES
- CAPOCCI V GOBLE
- CEREX JEWELS LTD V PEACHEY PROPERTY CORPORATION PLC
- EDWARDS V THOMPSON
- LEASE RENEWAL
- LEVY AND SON LTD V MARTIN BRENT DEVELOPMENTS LTD
- LONDON HILTON JEWELLERS LTD V HILTON INTERNATIONAL HOTELS LTD
- MAYER V REDDICK
- MORAR V CHAUHAN
- OPPOSITION
- OWNER-OCCUPATION
- REDEVELOPMENT
- ROMULUS TRADING CO LTD V TRUSTEES OF HENRY SMITHS CHARITY
- LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS44687 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 48502-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Examines three ways under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s30 by which a landlord can oppose a new tenancy on the grounds of his intention to redevelop the holding or to occupy the premises himself. Discusses recent case law . References.