Moore and another v Khan-Ghauri
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1991) 32 EG 63-65(3)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: CA 10 May 1991. The successful bidder at auction, who failed to complete on the property, appealed against forfeiture of his deposit and damages for breach of contract. The appellant`s claim that he had been assured before the sale that any purchase at the sale could be inspected and valued before completion was spurious. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS44913 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 49855-1001 |
CA 10 May 1991. The successful bidder at auction, who failed to complete on the property, appealed against forfeiture of his deposit and damages for breach of contract. The appellant`s claim that he had been assured before the sale that any purchase at the sale could be inspected and valued before completion was spurious. Appeal dismissed.