Stamp duty evasion deplored
Language: English Series: Times ; 24/3/87 p37Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: In Saunders and Another v Edwards and Another , CA 13 March 1987, it was held that where, due to a vendor`s fraudulent misrepresentation , a purchaser paid a higher price for a property, the appropriate value for the purposes of awarding damages to the purchaser was the true value at completion date. The purchaser was entitled to damages equivalent to the loss suffered.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2313-42 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 49912-1001 |
In Saunders and Another v Edwards and Another , CA 13 March 1987, it was held that where, due to a vendor`s fraudulent misrepresentation , a purchaser paid a higher price for a property, the appropriate value for the purposes of awarding damages to the purchaser was the true value at completion date. The purchaser was entitled to damages equivalent to the loss suffered.