Assignment of tenancy
Language: English Series: Times ; 22 November 1991, 19(1) | Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1991 EGCS 124(1) (7/12/91)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: "Crago v Julian" CA 21 November 1991. It was held that a tenancy had to be assigned in writing; an oral agreement was only sufficient for a short-term lease. The appeal against the decision that the appellant`s ex-husband had not assigned the tenancy to her in spite of written intentions to do so, was dismissed with reference to Law of Property Act 1925 s53(1)(a).| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2746-20 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 50379-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
"Crago v Julian" CA 21 November 1991. It was held that a tenancy had to be assigned in writing; an oral agreement was only sufficient for a short-term lease. The appeal against the decision that the appellant`s ex-husband had not assigned the tenancy to her in spite of written intentions to do so, was dismissed with reference to Law of Property Act 1925 s53(1)(a).