Unlawful eviction: damages
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1992 EGCS 51(2) (18/4/92)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: "Jones and another v Miah and another" CA 7 April 1992. J, the plaintiffs, were protected tenants who had contested eviction by M from mixed use premises, but the defendants appealed against the damages awarded and had the figure reduced.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2817-52 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 50441-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2815-48 Roll-over relief | WB2816-34 Solicitors` duty of care | WB2817-47 Trust land may not be sold | WB2817-52 Unlawful eviction: damages | WB2817-53 Rent review clause | WB2817-54 Rent review clause | WB2817-63 Green belt development |
"Jones and another v Miah and another" CA 7 April 1992. J, the plaintiffs, were protected tenants who had contested eviction by M from mixed use premises, but the defendants appealed against the damages awarded and had the figure reduced.