An ambiguity opens up the question of site possession
Language: English Series: Contract Journal ; 16 April 1987, 12(1)Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: With reference to caselaw the author disagrees with the view expressed in the February Construction Law Digest that the insurance amendments to JCT 80 have brought about a fundamental change to the contractor`s right to possession of the site because of new clause 23.3.1, He argues that the position is unchanged by the new clause.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS37570 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 5293-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
With reference to caselaw the author disagrees with the view expressed in the February Construction Law Digest that the insurance amendments to JCT 80 have brought about a fundamental change to the contractor`s right to possession of the site because of new clause 23.3.1, He argues that the position is unchanged by the new clause.