Building law is time-barred
Language: English Series: Financial Times ; 23/1/87 p29(2)Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: In Ketteman and Others v Hansel Properties Ltd and Others HL 22 January 1987 it was held that leave to amend the defence, enabling it to plead that the limitation period for latent defects was from an earlier date than was originally believed, was not allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2304-16 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 51585-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In Ketteman and Others v Hansel Properties Ltd and Others HL 22 January 1987 it was held that leave to amend the defence, enabling it to plead that the limitation period for latent defects was from an earlier date than was originally believed, was not allowed.