Esselte AB and another v Pearl Assurance plc
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1995) 37 EG 173-178(6)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: ChD 9 May 1995. The second plaintiff (X) subunderlet part of an office block to the defendant tenants (P) for a 5 year term from 15 February 1988. On the same date the first plaintiff (E) sublet the whole office block to P (subject to the subunderlease) also for 5 years. P occupied the whole block until December 1992 and had removed all their equipment by 5 February 1993. E and X sought rent from P until June 1993 on the basis that no notices satisfying the Landlord and Tent Act 1954 s27(2) were served until 5 and 15 January 1993, expressing to expire in June 1993. E and X contended that because occupation was given up before the term date, no notice was due. Held that tenancy within the protection of the landlord and Tenant Act 1954.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS53620 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 5394-1001 |
ChD 9 May 1995. The second plaintiff (X) subunderlet part of an office block to the defendant tenants (P) for a 5 year term from 15 February 1988. On the same date the first plaintiff (E) sublet the whole office block to P (subject to the subunderlease) also for 5 years. P occupied the whole block until December 1992 and had removed all their equipment by 5 February 1993. E and X sought rent from P until June 1993 on the basis that no notices satisfying the Landlord and Tent Act 1954 s27(2) were served until 5 and 15 January 1993, expressing to expire in June 1993. E and X contended that because occupation was given up before the term date, no notice was due. Held that tenancy within the protection of the landlord and Tenant Act 1954.