Honourable intent?
Language: English Series: Chartered Quantity Surveyor ; 14(3) November 1991, 8(1)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: Stresses the importance of wording in letters of intent in terms of contractual obligation, particularly in following up claims for payment. Refers to three case law decisions: British Steel Corporation v Cleveland Bridge Ltd 1984; Kitsons Insulation Contractors Ltd v Balfour Beatty Buildings 1989 and CJ Sims Ltd v Shaftesbury plc 1991.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS45392 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 52677-1001 |
Stresses the importance of wording in letters of intent in terms of contractual obligation, particularly in following up claims for payment. Refers to three case law decisions: British Steel Corporation v Cleveland Bridge Ltd 1984; Kitsons Insulation Contractors Ltd v Balfour Beatty Buildings 1989 and CJ Sims Ltd v Shaftesbury plc 1991.