EWP Ltd v Moore
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; 1991 45 EG 180-188(5)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: CA 9 August 1991. Appeal by tenant (M) against a possession order granted to landlord (E) by the cc upon expiry of a fixed term tenancy granted to M for 23 months. No notice to quit was issued. M`s claim to be entitled to remain in possession at the end of the term on the grounds that the tenancy was a business tenancy under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II was dismissed. Considered "Gladstone v Bower" decision. Confirmed that a tenancy of agricultural land of more than one year but less than two years is a tenancy of an agricultural holding within the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986. Held that there is no security of tenure for a tenancy of less than two years. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS45462 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 53124-1001 |
CA 9 August 1991. Appeal by tenant (M) against a possession order granted to landlord (E) by the cc upon expiry of a fixed term tenancy granted to M for 23 months. No notice to quit was issued. M`s claim to be entitled to remain in possession at the end of the term on the grounds that the tenancy was a business tenancy under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II was dismissed. Considered "Gladstone v Bower" decision. Confirmed that a tenancy of agricultural land of more than one year but less than two years is a tenancy of an agricultural holding within the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986. Held that there is no security of tenure for a tenancy of less than two years. Appeal dismissed.