Freeholder has to show refusal unreasonable
Language: English Series: Times ; 21 January 1994, 34(1)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: "Estates Governors of Alleyn`s College v Williams", Chd 14 January 1994, held that on an appeal by a freeholder to an arbitrator against the refusal, by the managers of a scheme approved by the court under Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s19, of consent to a proposed development, such consent being subject to a proviso that it `shall not be unreasonably withheld` it was for the freeholder to show that the refusal was one at which no body of managers, acting reasonably, could have arrived.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3003-26 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 53370-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
"Estates Governors of Alleyn`s College v Williams", Chd 14 January 1994, held that on an appeal by a freeholder to an arbitrator against the refusal, by the managers of a scheme approved by the court under Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s19, of consent to a proposed development, such consent being subject to a proviso that it `shall not be unreasonably withheld` it was for the freeholder to show that the refusal was one at which no body of managers, acting reasonably, could have arrived.