No more charging up the system with in-house earners

By:

Eade, C

Language: English Series: Chartered Surveyor Weekly ; 37(9) 28 November 1991, 24-25(2)Publication details: 1991Subject(s):

Summary: Assesses the responses from councils, planners and developers to the HL ruling in "R v Richmond Upon Thames LBC, ex parte McCarthy and Stone (Developments) Ltd" that planning authorities cannot lawfully charge for pre-planning application advice.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	ABS45624 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	54053-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	ABS45621 Learning from Europe: Britain beyond Bruges	ABS45622 Looking after number one	ABS45623 N J Stoop v Council of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea and London and Edinburgh Trust plc	ABS45624 No more charging up the system with in-house earners	ABS45625 Pre-application discussions	ABS45626 So what is different?	ABS45627 Standard infrastructure tax - local authorities` flexible friend	Next

Assesses the responses from councils, planners and developers to the HL ruling in "R v Richmond Upon Thames LBC, ex parte McCarthy and Stone (Developments) Ltd" that planning authorities cannot lawfully charge for pre-planning application advice.

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)