Rateable occupation
Language: English Series: EGCS ; (1988) 15Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: In Calmain Properties Ltd v Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council QBD 19 February 1988 it was held that the justices` decision that under estate agents ` particulars the company was indicating that a bay was open for business as a warehouse and was therefore in rateable occupation , was correct.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2410-39 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 54777-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2410-36 QS merger | WB2410-37 Urgency over rates ruling | WB2410-38 Rates reform warning | WB2410-39 Rateable occupation | WB2410-40 Halfords to double number of stores | WB2410-41 VAT men defeated in tax case | WB2411-01 Unlovely as a tree |
In Calmain Properties Ltd v Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council QBD 19 February 1988 it was held that the justices` decision that under estate agents ` particulars the company was indicating that a bay was open for business as a warehouse and was therefore in rateable occupation , was correct.