Image from Google Jackets

Misdescription : vendors beware

By: Contributor(s): Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (9504) 28 January 1995, 76(1)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: Discusses decisions on property misdescriptions at auction which find that the onus is on the vendor and his auctioneers to be accurate. Cases include "Museprime Properties Ltd v Adhill Properties Ltd" (Abs43413), "Atlantic Estates Ltd v Ezekiel" (WB2719-01), "St Marylebone Property Co Ltd v Payne" (Abs51659), "King Brothers (Finance) Ltd v North Western British Road Services Ltd", "Rignall Developments v Halil" (Abs37864), "Production Techology Consultants v Bartlett" (Abs39393) and "McCullagh v Lane Fox and Partners Ltd" (Abs50202).

Discusses decisions on property misdescriptions at auction which find that the onus is on the vendor and his auctioneers to be accurate. Cases include "Museprime Properties Ltd v Adhill Properties Ltd" (Abs43413), "Atlantic Estates Ltd v Ezekiel" (WB2719-01), "St Marylebone Property Co Ltd v Payne" (Abs51659), "King Brothers (Finance) Ltd v North Western British Road Services Ltd", "Rignall Developments v Halil" (Abs37864), "Production Techology Consultants v Bartlett" (Abs39393) and "McCullagh v Lane Fox and Partners Ltd" (Abs50202).