Landlord`s term too vague
Language: English Series: Times ; 3 November 1992, 35(1)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: "Gray v Brown" CA 3 November 1992. It was held that the landlord`s vague terms in the tenancy did not make it clear that he reserved the right to move into the property himself and share facilities; therefore the tenancy was protected, coming under Rent Act 1977 s22.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2843-39 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 55336-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
"Gray v Brown" CA 3 November 1992. It was held that the landlord`s vague terms in the tenancy did not make it clear that he reserved the right to move into the property himself and share facilities; therefore the tenancy was protected, coming under Rent Act 1977 s22.