Image from Google Jackets

Management company charges

Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1992 EGCS 28(2) (7/3/92)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: "Bratton Seymour Service Co Ltd v Oxborough" CA 21 February 1992. It was held that a covenant for residents to pay a proportion of the cost of maintaining utilities did not, by implication on the basis of business efficacy, include the cost of maintaining amenities.

"Bratton Seymour Service Co Ltd v Oxborough" CA 21 February 1992. It was held that a covenant for residents to pay a proportion of the cost of maintaining utilities did not, by implication on the basis of business efficacy, include the cost of maintaining amenities.