Limiting distress
Language: English Series: Solicitors` Journal ; 138(20) 27 May 1994, 524(1)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: An update on the law of distress, reporting two cases which have arisen since Abs49659: "Eller v Grovecrest Investments Ltd" (1994) and "Eren v Tranmac Ltd" (1993). The outcome in both cases set limits on landlords` power, the first decision reversing the establised view that a tenant cannot use set-off as defence against a landlord`s distress.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS50675 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 56049-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
An update on the law of distress, reporting two cases which have arisen since Abs49659: "Eller v Grovecrest Investments Ltd" (1994) and "Eren v Tranmac Ltd" (1993). The outcome in both cases set limits on landlords` power, the first decision reversing the establised view that a tenant cannot use set-off as defence against a landlord`s distress.